 
 
 
 
 
   
 is passed through a linear filter with
  transfer function
 is passed through a linear filter with
  transfer function  ,
,
 
 .  The mean of
.  The mean of  is measured to be
 is measured to be
 and the covariance function of
 and the covariance function of  is found to be
 is found to be
 
 .
.
 .
.
 is
  wide-sense stationary, zero mean, and Gaussian.  The following measurement
  system is proposed.
 is
  wide-sense stationary, zero mean, and Gaussian.  The following measurement
  system is proposed.
 
Here  is the transfer function of an ideal bandpass filter and
 is the transfer function of an ideal bandpass filter and  is an ideal lowpass,
  is an ideal lowpass,
  
 
 
 is small compared to the range of frequencies over which
 is small compared to the range of frequencies over which
   varies, i.e., you may assume that
 varies, i.e., you may assume that  is constant over intervals
  of width
 is constant over intervals
  of width  .
.
  
 in terms of the second
    order description of
 in terms of the second
    order description of  .
.
 .
.
 .
.
 , comment on the accuracy of this
    measurement of the power density of the process
, comment on the accuracy of this
    measurement of the power density of the process  .
.
  
 of a
  stock is described by
 of a
  stock is described by
   
 is the constant our knowledgeable broker is seeking and
 is the constant our knowledgeable broker is seeking and  is a
  stochastic process describing the random fluctuations.
 is a
  stochastic process describing the random fluctuations.   is a white,
  Gaussian process having spectral height
 is a white,
  Gaussian process having spectral height  .  The broker decides to
  estimate
.  The broker decides to
  estimate  according to:
 according to:
   
 is to be found.
 is to be found.
  
 for any
 for any
     the broker might choose.
 the broker might choose.
 is to use simple averaging (i.e.,
    set
 is to use simple averaging (i.e.,
    set  constant). Find the value of the constant which results in
 constant). Find the value of the constant which results in
    
![$E[\hat{K}] =
K$](img82.png) . What is the resulting percentage error as expressed by
. What is the resulting percentage error as expressed by
    
![$\sqrt{var[\hat{K}]}/\vert E[\hat{K}]\vert$](img83.png) ?
?
 and choose
 and choose  to yield
 to yield 
![$E[\hat{K}] =
K$](img82.png) . How much better is this choice than simple averaging?
. How much better is this choice than simple averaging?
 is the best possible choice? Why or why not?
 is the best possible choice? Why or why not?
 
 
 
 
